What percentage of ecommerce brands use a 3PL?(2025 data)

Recent surveys show that roughly 37-60% of ecommerce companies outsource some or all order fulfillment to a third-party logistics (3PL) partner.

Our 2025 industry analysis puts full outsourcing at 37%, while partial outsourcing reaches 60% of online retailers. Additionally, 55% of companies plan to increase their outsourcing in the near future, indicating strong momentum toward external fulfillment partnerships.

Numbers at a glance

  • 37% of ecommerce companies fully outsource fulfillment operations
  • 60% of online retailers outsource fulfillment services at least partially
  • 55% of companies plan to outsource fulfillment in the coming years
  • 20% outsource their entire fulfillment process end-to-end
  • 70% of 3PL provider business now comes from ecommerce clients
  • $23.7 billion global ecommerce fulfillment market size in 2024
  • 14.2% projected annual growth rate through 2030

Ecommerce Fulfillment Outsourcing Breakdown

37%
Full Outsourcing
Complete fulfillment operations
60%
Partial Outsourcing
Some fulfillment services
55%
Planning to Outsource
Increasing outsourcing soon
$23.7B
Global market size
14.2%
Annual growth rate
70%
3PL business from ecommerce

Consolidated survey data (2023-2025)

SourceYearSample FocusOutsourcing RateNotes
Capital One Shopping2025Online retailers37% full / 60% partialEcommerce-specific analysis
Industry Analysis2025Ecommerce companies55% planningFuture outsourcing intentions
CSCMP 3PL Study2025All shippers89% successful relationshipsRelationship quality focus
Digital Commerce 36020243PL providers70% ecommerce businessProvider perspective
Grand View Research2024Global market20% complete outsourcingMarket sizing study

The data shows a clear upward trend, with partial outsourcing becoming the dominant model as brands seek flexibility while maintaining control over critical touchpoints.

Cost comparison breakdown

Cost ComponentIn-House3PL Partnership
Warehouse rent$8-15/sq ft annuallyIncluded in per-order fee
Labor costs$15-22/hour + benefits$2-5 per order
Technology systems$500-5,000/monthIncluded or $50-200/month
Packaging materialsDirect cost + storage$0.50-2.00 per order
Shipping ratesRetail ratesNegotiated discounts
Returns processingInternal labor cost$3-8 per return

The break-even point typically occurs between 1,000-3,000 orders per month, depending on product characteristics and geographic distribution requirements.

Regional and industry variations

Geographic distribution

North American ecommerce brands show the highest 3PL adoption rates at 46%, followed by European brands at 31%. Asian markets lag at 18%, primarily due to different logistics infrastructure and cost structures.

3PL Outsourcing by Industry & Company Size

By Industry Vertical

Apparel
52%
Home & Garden
41%
Beauty & Fitness
38%
Food & Beverage
23%

By Company Size

Enterprise
62%
Established
51%
Growth Stage
45%
Startups
28%

Geographic Distribution

46%
North America
31%
Europe
18%
Asia

Industry-specific patterns

  • Apparel and accessories: 52% outsourcing rate (highest)
  • Home and garden: 41% outsourcing rate
  • Beauty and fitness: 38% outsourcing rate
  • Food and beverage: 23% outsourcing rate (lowest due to specialized requirements)

Company size correlation

  • Startups (0-2 years): 28% outsourcing rate
  • Growth stage (3-5 years): 45% outsourcing rate
  • Established brands (5+ years): 51% outsourcing rate
  • Enterprise (>$50M revenue): 62% outsourcing rate

Why the reported percentages vary

The wide range in outsourcing statistics—from 12% to 60%—reflects different survey methodologies and definitions across industry research.

Different survey populations

Some studies focus exclusively on direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands, while others include B2B retailers, marketplace sellers, and traditional retailers with online channels. Enterprise-level companies show different outsourcing patterns than small-to-medium businesses, with larger retailers more likely to maintain hybrid models.

Definitions of “outsourcing”

Research varies in how it defines fulfillment outsourcing. Some surveys count only complete end-to-end outsourcing, while others include partial arrangements like:

  • Peak season overflow capacity
  • Specific geographic regions
  • Certain product categories
  • Returns processing only
  • Amazon FBA alongside independent 3PLs

Geographic and temporal differences

U.S.-focused studies typically show higher outsourcing rates than global surveys. Additionally, the rapid growth in 3PL adoption means that studies conducted even 12 months apart can show significantly different baseline percentages.

Factors driving outsourcing growth

Labor and real estate cost pressures

Warehouse labor costs increased 4.23% annually in 2024, while commercial real estate for fulfillment facilities has become increasingly expensive in major metropolitan areas. Many brands find that 3PL partnerships offer immediate access to trained staff and established infrastructure without the capital investment.

Two-day delivery expectations

Amazon’s influence on customer expectations has made fast shipping a competitive necessity. Independent research shows that 92% of consumers expect delivery within 2-3 business days, pushing brands toward 3PLs with multi-node networks and carrier relationships that enable faster, more cost-effective shipping.

Technology integration improvements

Modern 3PLs now offer real-time inventory visibility, automated reorder points, and seamless integration with popular ecommerce platforms. The technology gap that once favored in-house operations has largely closed, making outsourcing more attractive for brands prioritizing growth over operational control.

Seasonal demand management

Ecommerce brands face significant seasonal fluctuations, with many seeing 40-60% of annual volume during Q4. 3PLs provide flexible capacity that scales up during peak periods without the fixed costs of maintaining year-round infrastructure for seasonal demand.

Sustainability and compliance requirements

Environmental regulations and customer expectations around sustainable packaging are driving complexity in fulfillment operations. Many 3PLs have invested in eco-friendly packaging, carbon-neutral shipping options, and waste reduction programs that individual brands would find costly to implement independently.

When staying in-house makes sense

Order volume thresholds

Brands processing fewer than 1,000 orders per month often find in-house fulfillment more cost-effective. The fixed costs of 3PL partnerships—including setup fees, minimum monthly charges, and per-transaction costs—can exceed the variable costs of self-fulfillment at low volumes.

Product specialization requirements

Highly customized products, fragile items, or regulated goods (pharmaceuticals, supplements, alcohol) may require specialized handling that generic 3PLs cannot provide cost-effectively. Brands with complex kitting, personalization, or quality control requirements often maintain in-house operations.

Brand experience control

Companies prioritizing unboxing experience, custom packaging, or personalized inserts may find that 3PL standardization conflicts with their brand positioning. Luxury and premium brands frequently maintain in-house fulfillment to ensure consistent brand presentation.

Cost structure analysis

For established brands with predictable volume, the total cost of ownership for in-house fulfillment can be lower than 3PL fees. This is particularly true for brands with:

  • Consistent monthly order volumes
  • Limited SKU complexity
  • Existing warehouse infrastructure
  • Experienced fulfillment staff

Future outlook and trends

The ecommerce fulfillment outsourcing market is projected to reach $40.07 billion by 2025, growing at 14.2% annually. Key trends driving continued growth include:

  • Micro-fulfillment expansion: Same-day delivery requirements pushing 3PLs toward urban micro-fulfillment centers
  • Automation integration: 52% of warehouse operators plan automation investments, making 3PL partnerships more attractive
  • International expansion: Cross-border ecommerce growth requiring specialized logistics expertise
  • Sustainability focus: Environmental compliance driving brands toward 3PLs with established green programs

Frequently asked questions

What percentage of retailers outsource fulfillment?
Approximately 37-60% of ecommerce retailers outsource fulfillment services, with the variation depending on whether partial or complete outsourcing is measured.

How many ecommerce companies use Amazon FBA vs independent 3PLs?
While specific breakdowns vary, industry data suggests roughly 40% of outsourcing brands use Amazon FBA exclusively, 35% use independent 3PLs, and 25% use hybrid approaches.

Does outsourcing fulfillment reduce shipping costs?
Yes, 3PLs typically achieve 15-30% shipping cost savings through negotiated carrier rates and zone skipping strategies that individual brands cannot access.

At what order volume should I switch to a 3PL?
The typical break-even point occurs between 1,000-3,000 orders per month, though this varies based on product characteristics, shipping zones, and current operational efficiency.

Can I outsource fulfillment internationally while keeping US stock?
Yes, many 3PLs offer international fulfillment services while maintaining domestic inventory, though this requires careful coordination of inventory allocation and demand forecasting.

What KPIs should I watch after moving to a 3PL?
Monitor order accuracy (target: 99.5%+), ship time (target: same or next day), cost per order, customer satisfaction scores, and inventory accuracy rates.

Is it risky to let a 3PL handle returns?
Modern 3PLs have sophisticated returns processing capabilities, often handling returns more efficiently than in-house operations due to specialized workflows and technology.

How long does an average 3PL onboarding take?
Typical onboarding ranges from 30-90 days depending on integration complexity, inventory transfer requirements, and system setup needs.

Final thoughts

The data clearly shows that ecommerce fulfillment outsourcing has reached mainstream adoption, with 37% of brands fully outsourcing and 60% using some form of external fulfillment support. The trend toward outsourcing continues accelerating, driven by cost pressures, customer expectations, and the complexity of modern ecommerce operations.

For brands evaluating their options, the decision increasingly centers not on whether to outsource, but when and how to structure the partnership for maximum benefit. The most successful transitions involve careful planning, clear performance metrics, and phased implementation that allows for optimization over time.

The 55% of companies planning to increase outsourcing suggests this trend will continue growing, making 3PL partnerships a standard component of ecommerce operations rather than an exception.

Sources & methodology